Less
than
three
percent
of
the
human
genome
consists
of
genes
whose
products
are
expressed
to
create
our
minds
and
bodies,
and
less
than
one
percent
of
these
genes
produce
visible
characteristics
like
skin
color.
Yet
history
has
been
marked
by
discrimination
based
on
the
visible,
but
biologically
negligible,
differences
called
"racial"
characteristics.
| Is
race
biologically
important? |
Which
puts
the
new
National
Human
Genome
Center
at
Howard
University,
and
its
director
and
founder
Georgia
Dunston,
professor
and
chair
of
microbiology
and
director
of
human
immunogenics
for
the
university,
in
the
odd
position
of
making
the
scientific
case
against
the
biological
importance
of
race
while
pressing
for
efforts
to
increase
inclusion
of
Africans
and
African-Americans
in
genetic
research,
both
as
researchers
and
participants.
Dunston's
lab
is
currently
conducting
research
on
West
Africans
and
on
African-Americans,
looking
for
genes
for
diabetes
and
prostate
cancer,
both
of
which
disproportionately
affect
people
of
African
descent.
The
center
was
conceived
in
the
early
nineties,
but
it
was
not
until
1998
that
Dunston
gained
enough
funding
to
hire
new
staff
and
significantly
increase
lab
capacity.
| To
benefit
from
genetic
research,
all
must
participate. |
"Statistics
show
that
85
percent
of
human
variation
is
within
whites
or
blacks,
not
between
them,"
says
Dunston.
"The
category
of
'black'
or
'white'
is
spurious
and
the
differences
that
are
observable
provide
no
basis
for
partitioning
groups."
There
are,
however,
differences
that
relate
to
particular
genetic
lineages,
so
it
is
important
for
all
groups
seeking
to
benefit
from
genetic
research
to
participate
in
it.
Dunston
came
to
genomic
research
via
her
interest
in
transplantation,
a
field
that
provides
another
illustration
of
the
superficiality
of
racial
differences.
In
order
to
match
tissues,
researchers
look
at
an
immune
system
component
called
the
Major
Histocompatibility
Complex.
A
match
of
six
HLA
antigens
in
this
system
means
an
organ
is
compatible.
Quite
frequently,
cross-racial
transplants
provide
better
matches
than
those
from
the
same
racial
groups.
| Dunston
fought
hard
for
Howard's
piece
of
the
Human
Genome
Project. |
Because
racism
continues
to
play
a
role
in
how
African-Americans
are
treated,
and
because
genetic
research
has
often
been
used
in
attempts
to
prove
racial
inferiority,
Dunston
fought
hard
to
ensure
that
the
traditionally
black
Howard
University
would
play
an
important
role
in
the
Human
Genome
Project.
Creating
a
center
for
genomic
research
at
Howard
increases
the
university's
ability
to
train
black
researchers
and
attract
more
into
the
field,
while
conducting
research
that
could
benefit
African-Americans.
"The
human
genome
project
is
a
major
event
of
our
time
and
one
important
[if
not
the
essential]
characteristic
of
the
genome
is
sequence
variation,"
says
Dunston.
"Populations
vary
in
their
patterns
of
genetic
variation,
and
what
I
proposed
with
others
at
Howard
was
that
we
need
to
have
a
resource
that
[allows
examination
of]
the
variation
in
the
African-American
population."
| The
African
population,
older,
is
more
diverse. |
"Since
the
African
population
is
the
oldest
group,
there
has
been
more
time
for
the
accumulation
of
variations,"
she
adds,
which
is
another
reason
to
focus
on
it.
Variation
provides
a
species
with
the
ability
to
survive
in
a
wide
range
of
circumstances,
so,
as
Dunston
points
out,
diversity
is
a
key
to
human
development
and
survival.
The
very
first
human
DNA
to
be
sequenced
by
the
human
genome
project
came
from
a
group
of
European
families,
selected
because
their
genetic
history
had
already
been
reported
and
their
pedigrees
detailed.
This
provided
only
the
broad
outlines
of
the
genome;
the
genes
sequenced
in
later
phases
came
from
many
different
racial
and
ethnic
groups.
| Dunston
wanted
data
on
"variation
in
the
African
population." |
Dunston
wanted
to
create
a
similar
basic
resource
for
Africans.
"My
goal
was
to
provide
a
reference
on
the
spectrum
of
variation
in
the
African
population,"
she
says.
Though
an
early
attempt
to
get
NIH
funding
for
this
project
failed,
she
has
been
able
to
collect
much
of
the
data
she
sought
through
a
project
to
study
diabetes
in
Africa,
which
grew
out
of
a
fellowship
she
did
at
the
National
Human
Genome
Research
Institute.
"Francis
Collins
had
spent
five
months
working
in
a
missionary
hospital
in
Nigeria
and
he
was
intrigued
with
the
difference
in
clinical
presentation
of
type
II
diabetes
between
Africa
and
the
United
States,"
says
Dunston.
In
America,
type
II
diabetes
is
usually
associated
with
obesity,
which
itself
causes
many
health
problems
and
makes
it
difficult
to
determine
which
problems
are
related
to
the
diabetes
and
which
to
the
obesity.
In
Africa,
however,
type
II
diabetics
are
often
lean.
| "I
considered
it
totally
from
heaven." |
"[Collins]
knew
I
was
interested
in
building
capacity
at
Howard
and
studying
African
genetics
so
he
suggested
a
collaboration.
I
considered
it
totally
from
heaven,"
says
Dunston.
The
admiration
is
mutual.
"The
promise
of
genomics
for
unraveling
the
mysteries
of
diseases
like
diabetes
and
prostate
cancer
is
profound,"
says
Collins.
"It
would
be
tragic
indeed
if
these
advances
did
not
reach
populations
at
particularly
high
risk.
Thus,
involving
African-American
populations
in
genetic
studies
on
conditions
such
as
this
is
critical
to
the
future.
Dunston
and
her
able
team
are
making
dramatic
inroads
into
an
area
of
inquiry
which
has
previously
been
underserved.
The
quality
of
their
research,
and
their
attention
to
community
concerns,
is
exemplary."
| The
Africa
America
Diabetes
study
focuses
on
West
Africa. |
The
study,
Africa
America
Diabetes
Mellitus
(AADM),
focuses
on
West
Africa,
since
most
African-Americans
trace
their
lineage
to
slaves
captured
on
the
coast
from
Senegal
to
Angola.
Genetic
material
has
been
collected
at
five
sites:
three
in
Nigeria,
two
in
Ghana.
A
genome-wide
scan
of
these
samples
to
find
genes
related
to
type
II
diabetes
is
currently
being
conducted.
Charles
Rotimi,
now
associate
professor
and
director
of
genetic
epidemiology
at
Howard,
was
recruited
by
Dunston
in
1999.
"Going
to
West
Africa
gives
us
an
opportunity
to
understand
type
II
diabetes
with
less
noise
from
the
environment,"
says
Rotimi.
He
adds,
"We're
not
just
doing
'helicopter
science.'
In
fact,
one
of
our
criteria
for
determining
which
investigators
to
collaborate
with
there
was
that
we
would
help
improve
the
infrastructure
so
that
when
we
left,
they
would
continue
the
work."
In
previous
genetic
research
in
the
developing
world,
scientists
have
been
criticized
for
taking
samples
and
sometimes
even
patenting
genes
from
local
people
without
offering
them
any
medical
benefits
in
return
for
their
participation.
| "The
needs
of
a
community
have
to
be
factored
into
the
research." |
Concerns
about
exploitation,
about
the
potential
use
of
genetic
testing
to
discriminate
against
African-Americans
and
to
further
racist
ends,
have
inspired
an
approach
at
Howard
that
puts
ethics
front
and
center.
Charmaine
Royal
is
assistant
professor
of
genetics
and
principal
investigator
for
what
is
called
"GenEthics"
research
at
Howard.
"To
understand
the
ethical,
legal,
and
social
implications
of
genetic
research,
you
need
different
perspectives,"
says
Royal.
"Howard
brings
a
lot
of
that
from
its
history.
The
needs
of
a
community
have
to
be
factored
into
the
research
and
no
one
can
do
that
better
than
people
who
are
from
the
community
themselves."
The
history
of
medical
experimentation
on
black
slaves
in
the
United
States,
and
the
infamous
Tuskegee
syphilis
study
by
the
U.S.
Public
Health
Service,
which
denied
treatment
to
infected
subjects
for
40
years
and
ended
only
in
1972,
has
given
rise
to
a
great
deal
of
skepticism
among
African-Americans
both
about
science
in
general
and
about
participating
in
medical
studies.
| Blacks
are
less
willing
to
undergo
genetic
testing. |
As
a
result,
even
now,
a
federally
funded
study
of
health
and
nutrition
found
that
86
percent
of
whites
were
willing
to
have
genetic
tests
done
as
part
of
the
research,
but
only
74
percent
of
blacks
agreed.
Royal
recently
published
a
paper
in
the
Annals
of
Epidemiology
on
how
Howard
successfully
recruited
43
African-American
families
for
a
prostate
cancer
study,
which
had
strict
eligibility
requirements.
To
participate,
four
males
in
the
family
had
to
have
had
prostate
cancer,
and
at
least
one
had
to
have
been
diagnosed
before
age
65.
The
most
fruitful
source
of
referrals
turned
out
not
to
be
mass
media
campaigns
or
pamphlets
distributed
at
barber
shops,
churches,
or
health
fairs,
but
physicians
and
tumor
registries.
This
suggests
that
having
an
existing,
trusting
relationship
with
a
doctor
or
with
the
health
care
system,
and
being
invited
to
participate
in
a
study
centered
at
a
traditionally
black
college
and
run
by
mainly
black
researchers,
were
factors
allowing
recruitment
in
the
community
of
even
the
most
difficult
to
find
families.
| "We
can't
deny
history,
but
we
can't
be
guided
by
fear." |
Dunston
says,
"We
can't
deny
history,
but
we
can't
be
guided
by
fear.
If
you
don't
participate,
you
can't
expect
[designer
medicine]
to
be
designed
for
you.
The
greatest
protection
against
what
happened
in
the
past
is
for
us
to
have
the
knowledge
and
to
be
in
the
arena."
One
of
the
main
goals
of
Dunston
and
her
colleagues
is
to
recruit
more
African-American
students
into
scientific
careers,
an
area
where
currently
they
are
a
tiny
minority.
For
example,
only
about
four
percent
of
medical
school
faculty
members
are
black,
and
only
26
of
1,500
NIH
funding
panel
members.
For
her
part,
Dunston
credits
a
high
school
biology
teacher
and
a
series
of
mentors
for
encouraging
her
natural
interest
in
"asking
why"
for
her
start
on
the
road
to
a
scientific
career.
Neither
of
her
parents
were
high
school
graduates,
and
so
were
unfamiliar
with
the
trajectory
of
this
type
of
work.
"I
remember
my
mom
telling
me
that
people
would
often
ask
her,
'What
is
Georgia
Mae
doing
now?'
and
all
she
could
tell
them
was
'She
is
still
going
to
school!'"
| "The
genome
is
trying
to
teach
us
a
whole
new
way
of
looking
at
it." |
Dunston
sees
her
work
on
the
genome
as
having
implications
beyond
the
medical.
"We've
grown
up
in
a
culture
that
says
variation
is
abnormal,"
she
says.
"The
genome
is
trying
to
teach
us
a
whole
new
way
of
looking
at
it:
variation
is
the
instrument
that
allows
us
to
become
who
we
are.
Variation
is
like
our
vision,
you
can't
see
without
contrast."
On
the
recent
publication
of
the
data
from
the
Human
Genome
Project,
she
says,
"Publishing
the
human
genome
sequence
is
right
up
there
with
the
printing
of
the
Bible,
and
making
knowledge
available
and
open
to
the
public.
The
new
knowledge
will
challenge
old
ways
of
thinking
about
ourselves
that
are
unhealthy
and
too
limiting
for
self-recognition
at
the
genome
level
of
life."